Chapter 2
detailed summary tables of results

 2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS
  2.1.1 Rubi
  2.1.2 Mathematica
  2.1.3 Maple
  2.1.4 Maxima
  2.1.5 FriCAS
  2.1.6 Sympy
  2.1.7 Giac
 2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems
 2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

2.1 List of integrals sorted by grade for each CAS

2.1.1 Rubi

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.2 Mathematica

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.3 Maple

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 30, 32, 33 }

B grade: { 28, 29, 31 }

C grade: { 11, 12, 13, 25, 26 }

F grade: { 5, 10 }

2.1.4 Maxima

A grade: { 4, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 27, 30, 33

B grade: { 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 28, 29, 31, 32 }

C grade: { 24, 25, 26 }

F grade: { 5, 10 }

2.1.5 FriCAS

A grade: { 3, 4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 30, 33 }

B grade: { 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 10, 16, 17, 20, 21, 24, 28, 29, 31, 32 }

C grade: { }

F grade: { }

2.1.6 Sympy

A grade: { 4, 9, 14, 15, 19, 23, 27, 30 }

B grade: { }

C grade: { }

F grade: { 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33 }

2.1.7 Giac

A grade: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33 }

B grade: { 29 }

C grade: { 11, 12, 13, 25, 26 }

F grade: { 5, 10 }

2.2 Detailed conclusion table per each integral for all CAS systems

Detailed conclusion table per each integral is given by table below. The elapsed time is in seconds. For failed result it is given as F(-1) if the failure was due to timeout. It is given as F(-2) if the failure was due to an exception being raised, which could indicate a bug in the system. If the failure was due to integral not being evaluated within the time limit, then it is given just an F.

In this table,the column normalized size is defined as \(\frac{\text{antiderivative leaf size}}{\text{optimal antiderivative leaf size}}\)










Problem 1 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 225 225 149 252 1019 1076 0 220
normalized size 1 1. 0.66 1.12 4.53 4.78 0. 0.98
time (sec) N/A 0.136 0.286 0.051 1.607 1.866 0. 1.333


















Problem 2 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 111 111 130 124 825 892 0 163
normalized size 1 1. 1.17 1.12 7.43 8.04 0. 1.47
time (sec) N/A 0.048 0.143 0.034 1.589 1.85 0. 1.234


















Problem 3 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 91 91 105 83 626 302 0 107
normalized size 1 1. 1.15 0.91 6.88 3.32 0. 1.18
time (sec) N/A 0.034 0.063 0.03 1.511 1.771 0. 1.353


















Problem 4 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade N/A A A A A A A A
verified N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.01 0.534 0.028 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 5 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 107 107 132 0 0 872 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.23 0. 0. 8.15 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.086 7.678 0.116 0. 1.903 0. 0.


















Problem 6 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 227 227 152 244 1126 1065 0 225
normalized size 1 1. 0.67 1.07 4.96 4.69 0. 0.99
time (sec) N/A 0.142 0.29 0.044 1.613 2.129 0. 1.229


















Problem 7 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 112 112 134 120 910 882 0 166
normalized size 1 1. 1.2 1.07 8.12 7.88 0. 1.48
time (sec) N/A 0.053 0.146 0.035 1.526 2.166 0. 1.274


















Problem 8 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 91 91 109 79 690 297 0 109
normalized size 1 1. 1.2 0.87 7.58 3.26 0. 1.2
time (sec) N/A 0.034 0.066 0.032 1.443 2.089 0. 1.254


















Problem 9 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade N/A A A A A A A A
verified N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.011 1.176 0.029 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 10 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A F F B F F
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 108 108 136 0 0 861 0 0
normalized size 1 1. 1.26 0. 0. 7.97 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.089 9.151 0.111 0. 2.099 0. 0.


















Problem 11 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A C B A F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 66 66 72 75 247 180 0 72
normalized size 1 1. 1.09 1.14 3.74 2.73 0. 1.09
time (sec) N/A 0.057 0.159 0.033 1.437 2.495 0. 1.218


















Problem 12 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A C B A F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 52 52 76 49 166 155 0 58
normalized size 1 1. 1.46 0.94 3.19 2.98 0. 1.12
time (sec) N/A 0.025 0.074 0.028 1.485 2.515 0. 1.257


















Problem 13 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A C B A F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 39 39 22 25 127 61 0 28
normalized size 1 1. 0.56 0.64 3.26 1.56 0. 0.72
time (sec) N/A 0.016 0.023 0.027 1.393 2.482 0. 1.233


















Problem 14 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade N/A A A A A A A A
verified N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.01 7.306 0.026 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 15 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade N/A A A A A A A A
verified N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.04 9.458 0.036 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 16 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 268 268 176 281 397 1904 0 246
normalized size 1 1. 0.66 1.05 1.48 7.1 0. 0.92
time (sec) N/A 0.235 0.744 0.065 1.319 2.18 0. 1.277


















Problem 17 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 136 136 155 141 270 1650 0 192
normalized size 1 1. 1.14 1.04 1.99 12.13 0. 1.41
time (sec) N/A 0.093 0.393 0.049 1.268 2.103 0. 1.271


















Problem 18 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 110 110 140 94 130 358 0 127
normalized size 1 1. 1.27 0.85 1.18 3.25 0. 1.15
time (sec) N/A 0.066 0.143 0.043 1.568 2.12 0. 1.346


















Problem 19 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade N/A A A A A A A A
verified N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.033 32.532 0.056 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 20 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 268 268 181 273 435 1887 0 251
normalized size 1 1. 0.68 1.02 1.62 7.04 0. 0.94
time (sec) N/A 0.235 0.723 0.063 1.394 2.181 0. 1.315


















Problem 21 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 136 136 161 137 292 1634 0 194
normalized size 1 1. 1.18 1.01 2.15 12.01 0. 1.43
time (sec) N/A 0.093 0.388 0.051 1.294 2.155 0. 1.286


















Problem 22 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A A A F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 110 110 144 90 130 352 0 130
normalized size 1 1. 1.31 0.82 1.18 3.2 0. 1.18
time (sec) N/A 0.066 0.137 0.043 1.56 2.111 0. 1.328


















Problem 23 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade N/A A A A A A A A
verified N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.033 34.525 0.055 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 24 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A C B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 68 68 99 77 153 859 0 82
normalized size 1 1. 1.46 1.13 2.25 12.63 0. 1.21
time (sec) N/A 0.099 0.202 0.045 1.897 2.133 0. 1.215


















Problem 25 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A C C A F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 75 75 88 75 163 263 0 95
normalized size 1 1. 1.17 1. 2.17 3.51 0. 1.27
time (sec) N/A 0.054 0.205 0.046 1.802 2.277 0. 1.239


















Problem 26 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A C C A F C
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 56 56 48 49 61 132 0 57
normalized size 1 1. 0.86 0.88 1.09 2.36 0. 1.02
time (sec) N/A 0.034 0.072 0.039 1.529 2.157 0. 1.243


















Problem 27 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade N/A A A A A A A A
verified N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.032 10.7 0.054 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 28 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B B B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 261 261 194 493 724 1508 0 522
normalized size 1 1. 0.74 1.89 2.77 5.78 0. 2.
time (sec) N/A 0.172 0.528 0.056 1.508 2.235 0. 1.274


















Problem 29 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B B B F B
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 128 128 146 211 343 1033 0 282
normalized size 1 1. 1.14 1.65 2.68 8.07 0. 2.2
time (sec) N/A 0.06 0.232 0.036 1.372 2.248 0. 1.234


















Problem 30 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade N/A A A A A A A A
verified N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.015 2.462 0.079 0. 0. 0. 0.


















Problem 31 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A B B B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 311 311 240 558 814 2700 0 608
normalized size 1 1. 0.77 1.79 2.62 8.68 0. 1.95
time (sec) N/A 0.386 1.337 0.08 2.108 2.106 0. 1.307


















Problem 32 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade A A A A B B F A
verified N/A Yes Yes TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 160 160 177 241 406 1922 0 335
normalized size 1 1. 1.11 1.51 2.54 12.01 0. 2.09
time (sec) N/A 0.146 0.639 0.057 1.931 1.921 0. 1.333


















Problem 33 Optimal Rubi Mathematica Maple Maxima Fricas Sympy Giac









grade N/A A A A A A F(-1) A
verified N/A N/A N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
size 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
normalized size 1 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
time (sec) N/A 0.047 8.142 0.116 0. 0. 0. 0.









2.3 Detailed conclusion table specific for Rubi results

The following table is specific to Rubi. It gives additional statistics for each integral. the column steps is the number of steps used by Rubi to obtain the antiderivative. The rules column is the number of unique rules used. The integrand size column is the leaf size of the integrand. Finally the ratio \(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand size}}\) is given. The larger this ratio is, the harder the integral was to solve. In this test, problem number [11] had the largest ratio of [ 0.5385 ]

Table 2.1Rubi specific breakdown of results for each integral














# grade
number of
steps
used
number of
unique
rules
normalized
antiderivative
leaf size
integrand
leaf size
\(\frac{\text{number of rules}}{\text{integrand leaf size}}\)







1 A 12 7 1. 15 0.467







2 A 6 5 1. 13 0.385







3 A 5 4 1. 11 0.364







4 A 0 0 0. 0 0.







5 A 7 5 1. 33 0.152







6 A 12 7 1. 16 0.438







7 A 6 5 1. 14 0.357







8 A 5 4 1. 12 0.333







9 A 0 0 0. 0 0.







10 A 7 5 1. 35 0.143







11 A 12 7 1. 13 0.538







12 A 6 5 1. 11 0.454







13 A 5 4 1. 9 0.444







14 A 0 0 0. 0 0.







15 A 0 0 0. 0 0.







16 A 14 8 1. 17 0.471







17 A 8 6 1. 15 0.4







18 A 7 5 1. 13 0.385







19 A 0 0 0. 0 0.







20 A 14 8 1. 18 0.444







21 A 8 6 1. 16 0.375







22 A 7 5 1. 14 0.357







23 A 0 0 0. 0 0.







24 A 14 8 1. 15 0.533







25 A 8 6 1. 13 0.462







26 A 7 5 1. 11 0.454







27 A 0 0 0. 0 0.







28 A 12 7 1. 19 0.368







29 A 6 5 1. 17 0.294







30 A 0 0 0. 0 0.







31 A 14 8 1. 21 0.381







32 A 8 6 1. 19 0.316







33 A 0 0 0. 0 0.